Tuesday, October 19, 2021

Nerlens Noel NBA lawsuit could reveal an interesting financial gambit that benefited other players at Noel's expense.

What a harsh difference between the contract Nerlens Noel was allegedly offered and turned down, versus what he ended up signing. Allegedly Noel was offered 4 years at 70 million dollars but was told by his agent to turn it down because he deserved a Max contract.
Instead of 4 years at 70 million dollars, Noel ended up signing a 2 year, 3.75 million dollar contract, WOW, what a difference.

If it is true that Mr. Noel's agent told him he deserved a Max deal, then I am simply speculating there could have been an ulterior motive for throwing Mr. Noel to the Max Wolves.

I doubt a defensive specialist who is not a starter can nab a Max contract. If it is true that Noel's agent said he deserved a Max contract, is it possible that Noel was indeed set up by other people around him? Noel's refusal of a generous 4 year 70 million dollar deal could have created a temporary panic increase on contract offers being made to other players who may be more than defensive specialists.

If Noel is going to turn down a 4 year 70 million dollar offer, then that rejected offer could be cleverly used as a bargaining chip to get another player a much higher contract offer. "See, Noel turned down 4 years for 70 million, therefore player X is worth 4 years, 110 million".  

There could be tangental merit to Noel's claim, but proving it may be difficult, or, maybe not. While Noel may have to take responsibility for believing he deserved something he obviously did not deserve, a Max contract, if others were able to create better deals after getting Noel to reject a fantastic offer, then this may need to be looked into to ensure it does not keep happening.

Visit my LinkedIn page to learn more.

Wednesday, June 19, 2019

Lack of a Regulated Brand Continues to Thwart the Rise of Professional Women's Team Sports Leagues.

The Obvious reasons why Women's Team Sports Leagues usually struggle for acceptance and financial solvency do relate to the fact that Men's Team Sports Leagues already exist. Women's Team Sports Leagues literally have an elephant in the room to compete with, Men's Team Sports. However, Men's Team Sports Leagues seem to be more supportive these days regarding Women's Team Sport's leagues.

There is another factor weighing in that needs to be exposed in regards to why Women's Team Sports Leagues struggle to gain acceptance, and the root cause is something right under everyone's nose.

Let us take as an example Women's baseball, oh wait, softball, no wait, fast pitch softball, no wait, Women's Hardball Baseball with slightly modified dimensions from Women who play on Men's  Baseball team. And there it is, FOUR different Women's Baseball leagues all vying for acceptance. And even with four different leagues, a fifth could be added in which softball dimensions are updated for the Women players. I watched NCAA Women's fast pitch finals and the players have clearly outgrown the dimensions of the field.  So we could even call it five different types of Women's baseball and Softball all vying for the the same major stream of Sponsorship dollars that is actually available.

Boys and Men's Baseball and Softball really don't have this issue. Boys and Men generally play either softball, or baseball, and if one wants to be professional, they focus on baseball. Little league and below have one set of distances, Pony League and higher have another set of distances.

While many young girls are probably frustrated and feeling as if they are not getting their fair chance to become a baseball professional, the reality is the women who came before them and who are recognized as the true leaders of a women's baseball or softball movement, each grew up on a DIFFERENT BRAND of Baseball or Softball. They sincerely believe that if only one Brand of Professional Baseball or Softball can succeed professionally, it might as well be the Brand they played.

The results are very distinct passions for the specific Brand of Baseball or Softball played by Women who play that specific brand of Baseball or Softball when they were girls.

Women's Team Sports are literally in the Wild, Wild, West stage of development. A fact recently borne out when the USA Soccer team defeated Thailand 13-0 and was shamed for doing so. During the first Wild, Wild West of Men's Team Sports in America, a good thrashing was the best motivation for the thrashed Male Sports team to work and be better. Now that society has become "more civilized", a team should win, but apparently they should win within reason so the other team feels no public shame nor motivation to get better, gasp. The ability of the superior team to keep improving is thwarted as they must play down to the level of the team they play. That's not how Men's Team Sports did it in their early days.

If ever the concept of Branding needed an explanation as to its significance, the multiple versions of Girls and Women's Baseball and Softball illustrate that until one Brand breaks through, the entire Women's Baseball movement may languish.

Visit my LinkedIn page to learn more.

Sunday, May 19, 2019

Game of Thrones Series Finale Predictions?

Is the Series Finale for Game of Thrones all about the Dragon? Is the finale going to give the lone remaining Dragon its due? Will the Ice Dragon miraculously appear and become partners with the one remaining Fire Dragon? Perhaps they will go off somewhere and create a new race of Fire and Ice Dragon Babies that roam the earth keeping earthlings in check.

As G.O.T. series comes to a close the number of perceived Protagonists left alive has dwindled to a scant few. If Game Thrones does not end on a Good vs Evil note, will that be viewed as cutting edge television, or, will I be left asking why did I watch till the end only to have someone "win" who was a bad guy?

I did not become a regular viewer of G.O.T. until Season 7. But Season 7 did draw me into the hype. 

Regarding Season 8, Imagine if Present day Earth had to band together to figure out how to destroy an incoming Asteroid that would decimate the planet, succeeds in destroying the asteroid, then goes back to business as usual, would be kind of depressing to realize our inability to  channel humilty and gratitude for more than a moment or two. It seems like Earth's Asteroid is the path that G.O.T. has taken.

Perhaps Maisie Williams, aka Arya Stark would have the inside track as the last remaining Protagonist. Perhaps she is slated to become Queen while carrying a future King after her first time romp with Gendry.

But what about that Dragon?

Visit my LinkedIn page to learn more.

Saturday, December 15, 2018

Applebys with clever Gift Card Promotion.

I don't know if the Appleby's promotion I just saw on NFL Network has been done before, but I think it is very clever, will be very effective, and it's so simple. Buy a 50 dollar gift card for a friend, get a 10 dollar gift card for yourself, for free.

It's just such a simple, yet elegant offer. I do something for a friend, and I get a bonus as well. Well Done Appleby's. Now we just have to make sure the Gift Card has not been tampered with before purchasing.

Visit my LinkedIn page to learn more.

Thursday, September 13, 2018

Why the Try It Free offers can Boomerang back in a Bad Way.

The problem I have with Try it Free offers is, the price of what it will actually cost after the free promotion is over is usually not mentioned. I think this is a mistake for the following reasons.

Try it Free encourages people to try the product for free, and then bail at the last moment so they squeezed every possible bit of value out of the promotion before moving on. Meanwhile the Brand is hoping the customer will forget to end the promotion and get sucked into the vortex of forgetful consumer who keeps renewing because they keep forgetting to end the subscription.

While to some degree most subscriptions will have customers who only signed up to get the free service, some of those customers will forget to cancel the product or service. Should the Brand really rely on forgotten subscriptions going forward as a method for proving growth or popularity?

The "forgot to cancel, just wanted the free initial offer" consumer ends up being angry when they get tapped for money they either did not want to spend, or could not afford to spend. There is a price to pay by the Brand for customers who forget to cancel a service they were not going to keep once the promotion ended.

What really also upsets many free only consumers is just not knowing what the "fail to end subscription" price will be if they forget to cancel their subscription. It's one thing to know that the monthly bill is going to be a specific amount, its quite another to just not know.

The Smarter route to take is to incentivize signing up by giving a month free, and then just stating what the monthly charge will be thereafter. To sweeten the deal, offer a free month at the beginning of each subscription year. Of course not offers can be a free amount of time. Some offers are based on the size of an order, that is a discussion for another day.

If possible one intriguing idea is to get a message onto the consumers credit card or debit card that notifies them this was a free month. Maybe charge 2 cents and state this is your rewards month at the beginning of the program, and then repeat this message one time each year. 

Imagine giving a month free, the customer forgets they are being billed because the billing disappears for one month, then the bill starts up a month later. It might annoy the customer on some level because they may have taken that particular billing out of their monthly budgeting. Actually rewarding and telling the consumer about the reward seems like a better way to go than offer a free month in which no billing related message shows up.

Also key is to not raise prices every year. So from year one to year 2, I would highly advise no price increase. If in year three a price increase is needed, make the information known a few months ahead of time. Might be interesting to use the yearly free month incentive as a way to avoid price increases by eliminating the free month in year three.

There are many clever ways to offer incentives that don't upset consumers, I would recommend always taking that path versus hoping consumers forget they are being billed or don't have the time or patience to cancel.

Visit my LinkedIn page to learn more.

Monday, September 3, 2018

The Challenges behind being a Product and Brand Value Accelerator.

I can recall many occasions helping college friends, associates, and customers accelerate a project after it had been completed.  Back then I did not realize I was an accelerator. A couple of times I heard the word "agent" bandied about when it came to my helpful ways.

However, I have too much respect for agents to think I could do that job. Agents have to be part actor, part believer, and part business person while also being able to schmooze. I wasn't much of a schmoozer, however, I did manage to get myself welcomed into places where I could pitch my ideas. What made me successful at helping others was doing the best I could to help them with their project by either reviewing the finished project, or actually helping to create the project when the situation arose.

I had a remarkably good record at knowing when a project should or could be accelerated. However, and ironically enough, because I was not their agent many times the initial success I helped introduce associates to would result in the effort falling short for a variety of surprising reasons. The reason aren't important, what is important is that I did my job and gave the person axis to true success. 20 years later and there are close to a half dozen stories that would have been more noteworthy if the people I had assisted had just signed their agreements.

Going forward it would have been nice to have such testimonials. I may decide to reach out to some and see if they would be willing to give me a testimonial quote. In the meantime, I am moving forward on numerous projects. But as I heard on a Shark Tank episode last night, One is none, and two is one. I could not agree more. When I was the person helping someone else, two was one. Now as I go forward more or less on my own, one is none more than I care to admit.

Visit my LinkedIn page to learn more.

Wednesday, August 22, 2018

Recognizing a Great Brand Accelerator Strategy from the Shark Tank's Mark Cuban, Guardian Bicycle, and Amazon.

One of the Best Brand Accelerator announcements and strategies I have ever read  involves Mark Cuban of Shark Tank, Guardian Bicycles, and Amazon. 

The following paragraph from the Guardian Article is liquid gold... 
""Amazon's goal, and our goal, is to make Amazon the destination for safer bikes," Riley said. "They want to be known for selling bikes with this technology. That's really exciting. And Mark was an instrumental part of helping us put this together."
The above paragraph does multiple things all at the same time, and all of them are off the charts when it comes to accelerating Brand Value. While other bike companies have been reluctant to use the Guardian technology on all of their bikes, Amazon blazed to the front of the pack by stating they wanted to be in the bicycle safety business.

Good for Amazon, Good for Guardian Bikes, Good for the Mark Cuban team for seeing the value in using Guardian Bikes as a positive, proprietary leveraging asset for the right decision makers at the right company. Props to Shark Tank for connecting the right players at the right time. 

Props to the writer of the article,   – Digital media intern, Dallas Business Journal for finding such a great quote to put into their article. Why all the props? Because Guardian Bicycle Technology may save or prevent your own kid from an over the handle bars accident caused when old style brakes are applied too quickly and too forcefully.

You can read the full article here.

Visit my LinkedIn page to learn more.

Wednesday, July 18, 2018

Increasing email lists or Customer Request Numbers don't Always Paint a Truthful Picture.

No matter how an employee performs, at some point numbers may be exclusively used to determine their "value" and how well they "perform". But what if the numbers lie? What if entire sectors of a company have figured out how to amp up their results without getting caught and continue down this path because it is the only way to keep their job?

I am in the midst of a shocking discovery regarding a major corporation and satellite company fraud they refuse to investigate. The very well known company has an affiliate in India that is falsely coding customer requests. I am assuming this being done to show that as calls come in, the satellite company can show an excellent response rate by making sure they always code the customer calling in as wanting some type of information.

If the customer is actually asking to be taken off of a list,  an employee or satellite company can falsely code that  the customer wanted information. This creates the falsehood of an increasing customer response rate. Falsifying customer request records also causes the parent company to then pay for the resources necessary to fulfill the false requests being made by the satellite company on behalf of the customer. In this instance the further irony is the parent company has created a closed feedback loop system in which any complaints about the satellite company are automatically forwarded back to the same satellite company that is committing the original false requests! Wow! 

It may take years to discover a sector of a company is amping up their results. I recall early on in my working career I was at a very famous company that was going to merge with two other successful companies. The problem was each company had debt that they had hidden from each other while they all were comparing their bottom lines.

Each company thought they were being saved by the other two companies that had actually hidden an equivalent amount of debt. The three companies basically became three times as indebted once the merger was completed, and was out of business less than a year later.

Fast forward and one thing I notice on LinkedIn is a growing community of number crunchers who justify their value by the increased numbers of leads or email lists they are generating. Who can blame them, that is the method the company uses to justify their worth. 

I wonder if shrinking a data base of leads to the best and most qualified connections might prove more valuable than increasing a data base list among people who simply clicked to belong, irrespective as to how committed they actually are to becoming a future paying customer.

Amidst the potentially dodgy statistical dust that potentially can loom among all corporations, never forget that sometimes people outside of the company who value your actual product or service you provide may be your best bell weather as to what is right about your company. 

If one of those outside the company supportive entities believes they may have a way to accelerate value for your brand or product you make, do you have an intake system that might allow for some type of alliance with them? 

If an outside value accelerator can benefit your company by a much grander scale they themselves will personally benefit, it may make sense to have some type of intake mechanism. If you don't have an intake mechanism in place for Product an Brand Value Zccelerators, maybe its time to reconsider.

Visit my LinkedIN page to learn more.

Tuesday, July 10, 2018

NFL players Sue NFL regarding the National Anthem Kneeling Controversy.

As a Brand and Product Value Accelerator, I believe that one way to accelerate Value is to avoid lawsuits when possible. I have been making slow motion inroads on LinkedIn with various NFL contacts. My pitch is similar. I can resolve the National Anthem Kneeling Controversy.

I am so confident I can help that I would gladly exchange my ideas for a contingency deal memo, a contingency deal memo in which the NFL can set all the rules. Anyways, I'm still here, I still have the ideas, and I'll try again to see if the NFL is interested in hearing ideas that could resolve the National Anthem Kneeling Controversy.

Visit my LinkedIN page to learn more.

Monday, July 9, 2018

How would your company respond if someone claimed they could move 5 million units of one of your products?

How would your company react if a value accelerator claimed they could sell five million units of one of your products? Would you automatically laugh it off?  Why?

Do you have a policy in place that if a company employee is contacted via LinkedIn the employee knows how to respond? Do you have the proper intake within your company to give fair consideration to such an offer?

Employees might be afraid to forward a product value acceleration claim. Maybe the employee sees it as a test to see if the employee knows how to defuse what may be an unrealistic claim. But what if the claim could be backed up? If the employee is not sure are they going to be punished if they forward the product value acceleration claim on to someone else within the company?

If a company simply refuses to believe a value accelerator's confidence in one of their products, then the refusal becomes a self fulfilling, or, self unfulfilling wish.

Visit my LinkedIN page to learn more.

Saturday, July 7, 2018

Why Outside Value Accelerators are a good thing.

I operated my own videotape editing studio for 15 years. During that time I would edit with the client right next to me. Discussions between edits varied. When it came to internal company politics, I was informed that whenever a company president selected the direction their company would take, that there were at least 2 to 3 factions within the company that were all were competing with one another's vision vying for the President's blessing.

Inevitably some of the projects would take a back seat to the project the company President felt was the direction the company should go in immediately. Example, the company could promote its products via trade shows all over the country, radio ads, or create some type of live show that would be featured at the trade shows, or do sophisticated in store set-ups.

Once the choice was made those who had been lobbying for a different course of action would have to fall in line and be supportive of the president's decision, while possibly secretly being ready to turn the knife if the winning idea faltered in such a was as to blame the project chosen ahead of their own without faulting the president of the company.

Now add an outsider with an idea that could actually accelerate the brand or product value for the company. How are all of these factions that were already competing with each other supposed to react?

Yet the irony is the outside presence is supportive of the company and its products and services and has been inspired by the company's effort and results. It's all about perspective, is this outsider here because the company insiders didn't do their job, or did the company insiders do their job really well and it has attracted additional outside interest?

Back in the early 90's Panasonic's consumer video division created the MX-12 analog / digital switcher. Before it was to be released the professional division of Panasonic looked the product over and said it was too good for a consumer release. The MX-12 became a "prosumer", professional consumer product instead and this soon led to the MX-50, a remarkable analog / digital switcher for its time in the early mid 90's.

The MX-50 had a clip level control that allowed for amateur shot video to be readjusted by clipping the whites and bringing up other video levels to better control the contrast values. When combined with a videotape playback machine that had proc amp controls for the brightness, contrast, color and hue levels, the two units in combination offered remarkable control over consumer video footage that otherwise was deemed too contrasty.

Being able to analyze an existing product and accelerate its value is a good thing, and people such as myself who occasionally see product and brand value acceleration potential should be seen as the good guys, Intrapreneurs on the Outside looking in.

Visit my LinkedIN page to learn more.

Friday, July 6, 2018

Welcome to My Brand in Demand.

My name is Alessandro Machi and I am an Extrapreneur with Intrapreneur ideas and concepts. From time to time I'll come up with a concept for accelerating the Value of a Brand, or accelerating a Product within a Brand.

Presently there are over a dozen ideas and concepts for existing Brands, Products and Services I can help accelerate sales.

However, having a brand or product value accelerator idea, and actually creating a scenario where the company is willing to accept an extrapreneur's idea, is never as easy as one would hope.

I'm open to contingency deal memos, if a company I approach about accelerating their brand or product value does not want to use my idea, there is no charge. I am open to the company creating a contingency deal memo. If I believe strongly in a product of yours, believing in me can be mutually beneficial.

Visit my LinkedIN page to learn more.